People can’t be dubbed as terrorists on mere use of word ‘jihad’, rules Maharashtra Court

The India Observer June 19, 2019June 19, 2019 0 Comments #Akola, #ATS, #BJP-led government, #cowlynchings, #cowslaughter, #cowsmuggling, #cowvigilantes, #Eid, #indian Penal Code, #IPC, #Jihad, #Judge Jadhav, #Maharashtra, #terrorist, #The India Observer, #TIO, #UPA, Adam Rizvi, Beef ban

The Akola-based court of special judge A S Jadhav made the observation while hearing a case against the three persons accused under the stringent the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act.

Mumbai, 19th June 2019: A person cannot be branded as a terrorist merely for using the word “jihad”, a Maharashtra court observed while acquitting three accused of terror charges.

The Akola-based court of special judge A S Jadhav made the observation while hearing a case against the three persons accused under the stringent the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA), the Arms Act and the Bombay Police Act.

Abdul Razzaque (24), Shoeb Khan (24) and Salim Malik (26) were booked under various Indian Penal Code sections, including 307 (attempt to murder) and 332 (voluntarily causing hurt to deter public servant from his duty), following an attack on policemen outside a mosque in Pusad area of Akola on September 25, 2015, on the occasion of Eid uz Zoha, over beef ban in the state.

Also, Read TEACHER WHO RAPED STUDENT (4) WILL BE FIRST TO HANG UNDER NEW CHILD RAPE LAW ON MARCH 2

According to the prosecution, Razzaque arrived at the mosque, took out a knife and stabbed two policemen on duty and said before the attack that because of the beef ban, he would kill the cops.

The Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) claimed they accused were part of a conspiracy to influence Muslim youths to join terrorist organizations.

Jadhav observed, “It appears that accused Razzaque exhibited his anger by violence against the government and some Hindu organizations for a ban on cow slaughter”.

“No doubt he used the word ‘jihad’. But, it was adventurous to jump to the conclusion that only for using the word ‘jihad’ he should be branded as a terrorist,” he said.

According to the dictionary, the word ‘jihad’ literally means “struggle”, he pointed out.

Also, Read SC Tells States, UTs to Fall in Line With Order on Cow Vigilantism, Warns of ‘Wrath of Law’

“Jihad is an Arabic word which literally means striving or struggling. Therefore merely the use of word ‘jihad’ by the accused would not be proper to brand him as a terrorist,” the judge said.

Razzaque was convicted and sentenced to three years imprisonment for voluntarily causing hurt to policemen.

As he was in jail since September 25, 2015, and already spent three years in prison, he was released following the court order.

The court relied on testimonies of the injured policemen and other security personnel on duty.

Also, Read That Day in Gujarat. What pregnant Bilkis Bano Survived, gang-raped, brutal massacre of her 14 family members including her 3-year-old baby.

Also, Read Shwetambri Sharma says My Only Religion Was My Uniform: Officer Who Cracked Kathua Case

Also, Read Words, not silence, are the need of the hour, Mr. Bachchan

Also, Read Yashwant Sinha, Arun Shourie move SC seeking review of December 14 Rafale verdict

Copy Edited By Adam Rizvi